joerockt

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Avatar
    joerockt
    Member
    in reply to: Dot1q encap on 10Gb #353208

    Re: Dot1q encap on 10Gb

    auglan;257567 wrote:
    Yes you could try show int “interface name” switchport

    Once the trunk ports are up you will see the encapsulation type in the show int trunk output. You may want to check out the cisco feature navigator to confirm it supports dot1q only or isl only. I’m betting its do1q only though but you never know.

    ‘show int “interface name” switchport’ shows:

    Administrative Trunking Encapsulation: dot1q

    I think we’re good.

    Avatar
    joerockt
    Member
    in reply to: Dot1q encap on 10Gb #353207

    Re: Dot1q encap on 10Gb

    auglan;257564 wrote:
    That platform may only support dot1q. Most of the newer stuff doesn’t support ISL trunking anymore. So it looks like the default on that card.

    Also why do you have switchport access vlan 56 on a trunk port? Its either gonna be a trunk or an access port but not both.

    Yup you’re right. A trunk port will pass all vlans. Didnt think about that, and I’m surprised that it allowed me to do it.

    Avatar
    joerockt
    Member
    in reply to: Dot1q encap on 10Gb #353206

    Re: Dot1q encap on 10Gb

    Ah, ok well that makes sense. I did a sh int trunk, but I don’t see those ports I configured, guess that is because they are currently down.

    Any other way I can verify .1q on those ports?

    Avatar
    joerockt
    Member
    in reply to: Adding an IP to a port on a 3560X #353205

    Re: Adding an IP to a port on a 3560X

    Figured it out. Forgot to put the “no switchport” command first to put the port in layer 3 mode.

    Avatar
    joerockt
    Member
    in reply to: Access Based Enumeration #353204

    Re: Access Based Enumeration

    Crap, that didnt format right. Folders B, C and D should be under FolderA

    Avatar
    joerockt
    Member
    in reply to: 3560-X vlan config not showing? #353203

    Re: 3560-X vlan config not showing?

    Ah, that was it :mrgreen: Somehow I missed that. We have all our switches configured for trans.

    Thank you!

    Avatar
    joerockt
    Member
    in reply to: Exchange 2003 Event ID 1159: Uncommitted Transaction Logs #353202

    Re: Exchange 2003 Event ID 1159: Uncommitted Transaction Logs

    We ran into this this other day. Had our Exchange daily backup hang, causing an excessive amount of tlogs (1008 max for 2003), and thus dismounted all of our stores.

    Apparently there is a hotfix that will adjust this limitation, but it looks like its only for Exchange 2K?

    Avatar
    joerockt
    Member
    in reply to: Approx Time for Offline Defrag #353201

    Re: Approx Time for Offline Defrag

    joeqwerty;190026 wrote:
    Technically speaking, there is downtime. The users can’t access their mailboxes while they’re being moved. You can break the move up into chunks of users, but those users will have no access to their mailboxes while the move is in process.

    Right, I understand that. I’ll be doing this during our normally schedule maintenance period so we’ll be down anyway.

    I haven’t tried, but can I move multiple mailboxes at the same time? Or is it best to do them individually? I have about 20 to move.

    Avatar
    joerockt
    Member
    in reply to: Approx Time for Offline Defrag #353200

    Re: Approx Time for Offline Defrag

    Thanks for the replies. I’ll go ahead and move the mailboxes to another store and just delete that store. Sounds easy enough…

    Avatar
    joerockt
    Member
    in reply to: Mailbox Archive/Multiple User Access #353199

    Re: Mailbox Archive/Multiple User Access

    Thanks Virtual. I’ve created a share directory and group so only they have access to the pst. Now I just need HR to decide how far back they want the mailbox to have emails and I’ll test…

    Avatar
    joerockt
    Member
    in reply to: Mailbox Archive/Multiple User Access #353198

    Re: Mailbox Archive/Multiple User Access

    TonyROZe;155409 wrote:
    Why not increase the size limit of this one mailbox or better still have HR clean out old resumes and or post them to sharepoint.

    Well, no doubt they will need to clean out older resumes. I think once that is complete, we’ll have an idea of how much this mailbox usually contains and I can move to a larger mailbox store. But I’ll still need an archive solution. Going forward, Sharepoint might be an option, but for right now I’m looking for more of a quick and dirty solution…

    Avatar
    joerockt
    Member
    in reply to: Removing a User #353197

    Re: Removing a User

    Perfect. Thank you.

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)